About Me

Name: The Hermit Crab
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Attention Conservative Writers and Bloggers! Richard Nixon was not the the king of IRS abuse

Is it necessary for every Republican and/or conservative critic who writes about the current Obama IRS scandal to use Richard Nixon as the epitome of IRS corruption?  When Richard Nixon asked the IRS to investigate certain groups, it was because he was concerned that tax-free dollars were being used to fund illegal and/or violent "protest" activities. (I put "protest" in scare quotes because as honest inquirers now know the Black Panthers were merely a criminal gang using gullible liberals to cover for them by pretending to be something more.)  For the life of me I can't see what's wrong with that.  Remember that we were at war at the time.  On the other hand, after the patriotic Nixon declined to dispute the almost certainly stolen election of 1960, in which the legendary Chicago voting tombstones and the LBJ Texas machine gave (literally) the election to John F. Kennedy over RN, the ever-so-classy Knight of Camelot showed his gratitude by having Nixon audited in 1961, 1962, and 1963.

For real political abuse of the IRS, you have to look to Billy Jeff Clinton.  During his infamous reign, at least 12 conservative groups were audited by the IRS, perhaps 20 or more.  I also read that all five women who publicly accused BJ Horndog of abusing them were audited as well.  (Which leads me to pose the question of whether an IRS anal exam is more or less pleasant than what Clinton did to them.)  Even a woman who declared in advance that she would confront Al Gore at a public event to ask him how he could continue to serve such a man received a letter the very morning of the event advising her that she and her husband were being audited by the IRS.

He's not Richard Milhous Obama, he's William Jefferson Obama!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Environmentally Friendly Recycle-Able Crab Shells

Since my book project has dwindled to an online voter guide idea, which may or may not ever "come off", I have returned to blogging, hopefully in time to be seen between the covers of a volume of my collected writings.

Since, however, much of our politics is ephemeral, both because of the twenty-four hour news cycle and because of the American public's ever-shortening attention span, I wanted to get my own time capsules planted someplace where they can be found later, so that my family, friends, and total strangers can see that I was thinking what I was thinking when I said I was thinking it.  I have little to be proud of as it is, but I have become a fairly savvy observer and predictor of events.  I don't want people to be looking at me like Al Gore gets looked at when he says he took the initiative and began what would become the Internet you're reading now.

May I offer a bit of advice?  While much of Wikipedia is fairly trustworthy and well-written, especially on history going back to World War II and before, it is most assuredly not to be trusted on recent history and current events, particularly on our present-day politicized scientific debates on "global warming" and the like.  May I recommend that you fill this gap with Conservapedia?  While it is younger and not as large as the older, liberal-edited Wikipedia, at least it's not edited by the normal liberal BSers trying to claim that Iran-Contra was not an attempt to overthrow our government, and it does admit the skill and dedication of the forces who fought to liberate the Cuban people from the increasingly bloody dictatorship of Fidel Castro.  Refreshingly, it also provides the crucial fact that John Kennedy crucially weakened the plan, withholding the air support that was so critical to the prospects of success of the mission.  Sports provides an expressive term for what John F. Kennedy (aka Mr. Profile in Courage) did at this crucial moment.  He choked.  As a critic stated at the time, JFK was "all profile, no courage".



I finally looked up the definition of dim sum.  According to Wikipedia "Dim sum refers to a style of Chinese food prepared as small bite-sized or individual portions of food traditionally served in small steamer baskets or on small plates."  I'm relieved.  I would have defined dim sum as the total of Obama and Biden's SAT scores.



Quick prediction:  The Democrats will do their not-exactly-on-the-level best to call off the Vice Presidential debate that the presidential campaign has featured at least as far back as 1984.  Do think any Democratic campaign consultant (Brian Williams, David Gregory, Diane Sawyer, et al) can sleep well at night after imagining Paul Ryan mauling Joe Biden in front of a national audience?  They had to struggle mightily to portray Biden as the winner against Sarah Palin in 2008, since they couldn't dishonestly chop up the tape like Katie Couric did to her interview with Palin.  (The amazing story is in the documentary Media Malpractice, and it's a jaw-dropping must-see for anyone who still believes that the major media is or even wishes to be an honest broker of electoral sweepstakes.)  They could try some of the shenanigans that they try during Republican Conventions, of course, like refusing to show or even admit that there are minority speakers at the podium, like they did to Congressman J. C. Watts a few conventions ago.  Since the whole point of televising  the debate is to hear what the candidates are saying, though, it would be just a shade too transparent a ruse to ignore Ryan when he's speaking "on the record".

If they can't wriggle out if the debate, though, every conservative talk show host and pundit in America will be eagerly awaiting the TV post-debate wrap-up, when the liberal broadcast teams will be trying to hypnotize their audiences into believing that they didn't really just see and hear what they thought they just saw and heard.

Good golly, Svengali!



Like most of you, I suppose, I spend my first few minutes checking my email cleaning out the spam from my emailbox.  While dumping my junk  mail yesterday, I saw one that invited me to "conference with naked teen BOOBS!"  Now, why would I want to confer with unclothed, underage Obama supporters?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Few Light Refreshments

From a particularly good post-election Impromptus (by National Review's Jay Nordlinger):
 
"How bad does California have to get, before the voters turn from the Democrats? How dire does the state’s economy have to become? Going down the tubes, Californians still know how to do one thing: reach for the Democratic lever. As far as I’m concerned, that’s like grabbing an anvil when you’re drowning."
 
Loved it -- and he's right.
 
 
 
Burt Prelutsky, formerly of this site (and how did THAT happen??) says this in his November 5th column:
 
"Speaking of rich people, I saw a list recently that listed the dead people who had made the most money during the past year. Michael Jackson pulled down $250 million; Elvis Presley, $60 million; Charles ("Peanuts") Shultz, $33 million; and Stieg Larsson, the Swedish novelist, $15 million. I assume the only thing that kept Harry Reid off the list was that he took in less than $15 million."
 
Burt also points out that there would be no room in the modern Democrat Party for a man with John F. Kennedy's beliefs on taxation, national defense, and communism, and that he'd have to be a Republican.  I've thought that for years...
 
 
 
Victor Davis Hanson, from his Oct. 20th column on National Review Online:
 
"The media are rebelling because they have wakened up to the current polls and concluded that Obama in 2008 had charmed them into sacrificing their reputations for disinterested reportage. Then once elected, he cynically counted on their continued subservience to destroy any shred of credibility that they had left."
 
I strongly suggest reading the whole essay.  Everything that appalls us about our President, Ferdinand Marxos, was capable of being known before Election Day 2008.  If the media (with some noble excetions) really doesn't understand where their reputations for objectivity went, they should read this, too.  (My local paper, the Rochester Democrat and Socialist, er, Chronicle, had no reputation left to lose.  They support the disgusting Louise Slaughter, for Heaven's sake.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »