About Me

Name: The Hermit Crab
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

End-of-the-Year Close-outs! (Vol I)

It's close to the end of the year, so it's time to dispose of some notes I never got around to writing up.  Here goes...
 
 
 
It is disturbing for a historically-inclined person like me to find out that only 8% of the BO czars, czarinas, and other inner-group types have any real experience in the business world.  Most of them are of the college hanger-on variety.  In Paul Johnson's classic Modern Times, the author describes another government as being populated by university students who had never run anything in their lives.
 
It was the Khmer Rouge.
 
 
 
During the health-care deform debates in the House of Reprehensibles, far-left rep Rosa DiLauro (D-CT) said that abortion was women's "God-given right".  Who knew that Rosa worships the gods of the Aztecs?  My God frowns upon human sacrifice...
 
 
 
 I suppose the sales job the congressional Democrats and the BO administration have used to pump up approval of the "Stimulus Bill" is understandable, in a way.  The spreading of a lot of manure helps crops grow, so they decided to try the same technique in the employment field.
 
 
 
After the Copenhagen "global warming" exercises, BO announced that the agreement signed would prevent the global temperatures from climbing more than two degrees.  If his predictions on the global temperatures are as accurate as his prediction of the effect of his stimulus bill on the unemployment rate was, we can start planning our 2011 November beach parties now.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Impolite Thoughts - Holiday Weekend Edition

A few updates ago I wrote of what I consider to be President BO's deliberate discrediting of America and its institutions.  I referred to his appointment of Eric Holder as Attorney General as discrediting the Department of Justice, given Holder's previously-demonstrated corruption.  I made an oversight in that item, apparently.  I forgot "incompetence".
 
 
 
My friend Libertarian Tony sent me an article on the hacked files from the East Anglia Unviersity of Scare-mongering (or whatever in East Anglia they are), disclosing what those of us on the global warming "skeptic" side have known all along -- that the global-warming/climate-change science is so obviously flawed (read: faked) that the scientists and other advocates of this phony theory had to know that they were perpetrating a fraud on the public.  Tony sent the link with the subject line "But don't we know that the scientific debate is over?"  I suggested that substituting the word "cancelled" for the word "over" might be more accurate...
 
 
 
One of my favorite occupations is reading the Impromptus columns of the invariably entertaining and thought-provoking Jay Nordlinger of NationalReview.com.  While reading his latest Impromptus, I ran across this:
 
"In a previous column, I mentioned Yoani Sánchez, the incredibly brave blogger in Cuba. She was recently beaten mercilessly by the usual goons. She survived and she is still making a glorious nuisance of herself — actually believing that she ought to be free.

Sánchez posed some questions for President Obama. And the president, or someone speaking for him, answered her. You can see those answers at Sánchez’s blog, here. They are pretty bland — pretty noncommittal, hardly Reaganesque, or GWB-esque — but acceptable, you may agree. Obama’s best sentence is his final one: “I look forward to visit[ing] a Cuba in which all citizens enjoy the same rights and opportunities as other citizens in the hemisphere.'"
 
I thought that BO's last line might be more ominous than our Jay may have apprehended.  Is the One advocating more liberty for Cubans -- or less for the other citizens of the hemisphere?  The BO administration hasn't exactly distinguished itself with its devotion to individual liberty.
 
 
 
 
 Also in Jay's latest, I read this:
 
 "As I write, there is talk of a prisoner exchange in the Middle East: 1,000 Palestinian prisoners for the Israeli soldier Gilad Schalit. That would be a more balanced deal than some we have seen in the past: when the Israelis gave up a mass of live prisoners — terrorists, mostly — for a few corpses. To see a little roundup of this history, go here."
 
I thought about this.  After all, I am the new, improved Christian Crab of TownHall.com, not the old atheist Hermit Crab of the now-defunct MyOnlinePublication.  Thus I'm not allowed to think "I would make that trade if I were the Israelis.  That is, I would as soon as I had infected all of the 'Palistinian' criminals being returned with a deadly disease, or inoculated them with a slow-acting poison.  Give the Pallys a taste of their own bargaining sincerity"
 
Am I?
 
 
 
Have a happy Thanksgiving, everyone!  I'll be back soon -- thanks for visiting!  ( A little Norlingerian geniality, for a change.)
 
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Reliable Charlie Goebbels

Evry once in awhile, my wife forgets to turn to Fox News when I come home from work, and I'm often exposed to a few seconds of Charles Gibson's Liberal News Tonight before I can reach the remote.  This happened a few nights ago, and I found my blood pressure spiking when old Propaganda Charlie led the broadcast with "...the evidence is mounting that global warming is causing the Iowa flooding" (I'm not certain of his exact wording).  Maybe he means that the evidence mounted from 0 to 0.0.  He may be as ignorant in math as he is in science.  At any rate, truth isn't what Charles Gibson is about, anyway.  He's a perfect successor to Peter Jennings, the late and unlamented anchor of ABC News.  He's not about telling the news, he's about influencing opinion -- by lying, if need be.  In my view, people like Gibson are as big a threat to our future as any foreign enemy.
 
Just call him Charlie Goebbels.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Handful of Observations

I've seen a few reasons advanced for the Democrats' opposition to the Columbia free-trade agreement.  Some have to do with unions, some others have to do with dislike for President Uribe (sp?).  Personally, I think it's because Uribe is trying to cut off the flow of cocaine into the United States, and this raises the price, which takes money out of Democratic pockets.  After all, the Democrats think that the way to lower gas prices is to continue to keep locked up the undeveloped oil, natural gas, and nuclear resources of the country, while raising taxes on the oil companies which would be only too happy to make energy more plentiful (and thus more affordable) if they were allowed to by Congress.  They also think that the oil development that they restrict will be increased if they take away the tax incentives for oil exploration and development.  This is the Democrats' traditional economic theory -- increasing taxes increases economic performance by the taxed.  This is rather like saying that a greyhound will race faster if you cut off one of his legs.
 
C'mon, they have to be on drugs!
 
 
 
Another tiresome assertion that Democrats rely on is that our overthrow of Saddam Hussein and our continued involvement in Iraq is "a distraction from the real war on terrorism".  First of all, I deny that liberating 27 million people from a blood-soaked tyrrany can ever be a mistake.  Secondly, as a largely self-educated American who knows his history, I am astounded at how few lives were lost in the performance of such a great work.  The Korean War cost roughly 34,000 lives (I'm going from memory -- I'm at work).  Vietnam, about 55,000.  The Civil War cost a nation of about 32 million population 620,000 lives. (Of course, we were both sides of that war, but still...)  Iraq has cost roughly 4,100 lives, and we have eliminated in one way or another at least 200,000 terrorists, according to careful students of our Iraq front.  I think this has worked out rather well, as the terrorists have been saving us the bother of hunting them down around the world.  They have been coming to Iraq on their own to take their lumps.  It's better for us to have them go to Iraq than to hunker down where they are -- or come to America.  Iraq has become our terrorist bug-zapper.
 
 
 
Thomas Sowell wrote a few years ago that perhaps the greatest threat to our country's future is the economic ignorance of the average merican.  He was right then, and it's even worse now.  We now have a majority party in Congress entirely elected by economic idiots, and run by same.  You could take all of the economic intelligence of the Democratic leadership in Congress, put it in a thimble, and still have room for your thumb.  I suspect that if you aspire to be in the Democratic leadership in this Congress, and you've taken any economics courses in high school or college, that's a disqualifier.
 
(Actually, I take that back.  Taking economics in school wouldn't be a disqualifier -- as long as you failed the course.)
 
Wednesday June 11 -- Little did I know as I wrote the above that last night the Democrats would take another whack at destroying our economy by destroying our energy supply.  Last night they tried to eliminate the tax incentives that the gas companies would recieve if the imbecile Congress would let them explore for and develop new oil fields (we have billions of barrels of domestic oil supplies locked up that we know of), and they also tried to confiscate the oil companies' profits, which they also can't spend on exploration and development because of the idiots in Congress.  Fortunately for all of us, the Republicans in the Senate rallied their forces to stop this fantastically wrong-headed proposal in its tracks.  The GOP is not completely worthless, no matter what my libertarian friend Tony may think.  
 
 
 
Have you noticed that the global warming scam-peddlars (sp?) have stopped referring to carbon dioxide being spewed into the air?  They just call it "carbon" now.  They want to conjure visions of little bits of coal in the air, which can't be healthy, right?  They don't want you to remember that carbon dioxide is an integral component of air, and furthermore that it allows plants to grow!  Do you remember those neat little drawings in your science textbooks?  The ones that showed arrows going back and forth between plants and people?  I know that science education in the schools has slipped since I went to grade school, but the science hasn't changed.  The "deadly greenhouse gas" carbon dioxide is still necessary for life on earth, and it always will be.
 
By the way, have you seen the PSA on "climate change" with Rev. Pat Robertson and "Rev." Al Sharpton?  Pat Robertson is a decent man, but he has always been a scientific ignoramus.  My wife watches the 700 Club (Robertson's show) on Wednesdays, and tells me the health advice they give.  I always ask her if she's going to watch a fitness channel next to get tips on theology.
 
 
 
Economics 101 time.  When the Democrats, in their one great acheivement of their majority status so far, raised the minimum wage, economic experts warned that raising the wage would result in fewer opportunities for unskilled laborers and teenagers in the job market.  Guess what?  The latest economic figures showed a decrease in the number of new unemployment claims in the last week, but an 10% increase in the unemployment rate?  This was caused by an influx of teenagers into the job market, where there were no jobs for them, because the minimum wage is now fixed higher than the value of the work they would provide to their new employers.  Raise the price of a commodity, you diminish the demand.  Fix the price of a commodity above its value, and you eliminate demand altogether. 
 
To the Democrats, the obvious is always mysterious.
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »