About Me

Name: The Hermit Crab
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

Deciphering Obama

I saw a headline at CNSNews.com which read

Obama on Non-Criminal Illegal Aliens: We Don’t Want to Deport Them; 'We Want Them To Succeed’ . 
 
For those still unused to BO and the Democrats use of language, let me translate:
 
Obama on Illegal Aliens:  'We Want Them to Vote'.
 
You see, if an illegal alien is willing to vote for the party who let them stay undisturbed in the country, the only law that the Democrats demand that they obey is the law of gravity.
 
 
 
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Stunning Political Discovery

While I was listening to an America's Morning Show podcast (making me officially a pod person) telling of another dreadful act that our NNM (neophyte narcissist Marxist) President was inflicting on our poor (read:  bankrupt) country, I suddenly realized the devilishly cunning campaign strategy BO is using to get another term in the White House.  He intends to make our country such a economic, social, and spiritual catastrophe that no-one will want to take the job in 2013.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Crab's First Book (Title)

The Crab is considering writing a book.  Everyone else seems to be, so why not?  I'm pondering what the title should be.  So far it's between "Optimism is a Mental Disorder" and "Observations on the Left -- Thirty Five Years of Amateur Proctology".
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Should Happen to the Westboro BS Church Traveling Freak Show

Here's what I suggest as a course of action the next time Fred Dip____ Phelps and his traveling freak show comically named the Westboro Baptist Church show up to disrupt a solemn event:

They should be met by counter-protesters carrying their own signs.  There should be more of these than the traveling loonies.  The counter protesters will have "home-field advantage", so this shouldn't be difficult.  The signs should have two different messages as specified below.
There should be one line of counter directly in-between the loons and the mourners at the funeral.  There signs should carry an appropriate counter-message, such as "God bless our soldiers", or whatever the particular occasion calls for.  These must be clearly distinguishable from the rabble from Westboro.  Bathing, shaving, and acting with dignity should suffice.
 
In addition, there should be two large signs held at either end of the asylum outmates'  line.  They should have matching signs, differing only in the direction of the arrows on the signs.  The arrows should point to the Westboro bozos.  The signs should read "Welcome, Westboro Inbred Baptist Church!"
 
Hey, it's free speech, right?

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Warning! Ill-Mannered Political Humor Ahead!

Last week the blogosphere and Fox News reported on the resignations of Vivian Schiller and Ronald Schiller from top posts at the notoriously leftist-promoting NPR (National Public Radio, or as Rochester conservative talk-show host Bob Lonsberry so aptly calls it, "Welfare Radio").  Does anyone besides me find Ron and Vivian's last name almost Dickensian in its appropriateness
 
 
 
The Hermit Crab hastens to deny the rumor that Senate (shrinking) Majority Leader Harry Reid is into necrophilia.  There is no evidence to support such a scurrilous charge.
 
I think it can be safely assumed that his wife is, though...
 
 
 
Riddle:  In what way is Stephen Reinhardt (current judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals) like Reinhard Heydrich ("retired" Deputy Reich Protector of Bohemia and Moravia)? 
 
Heydrich was a protector who offered no protection, and Reinhardt is a judge who offers no judgement.
 
 
 
I found a great Ronald Reagan quote in the Voice of the Martyrs newsletter (print version):
 
"How can you tell a communist?  He's someone who reads Marx and Lenin.  How do you tell an anti-communist?  He's someone who understands Marx and Lenin."
 
I take comfort in imagining my father, Abraham Lincoln, and Ronald Reagan swapping funny stories around a campfire in Heaven.  (Heaven must have campfires, mustn't it?) 
 
 
 
Next time:  A suggestion on what should happen at the next Westboro BS Church demonstration (of idiocy).
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Justice for Fulgencio Batista!

The Hermit Crab has a new mini-cause -- justice for the late Cuban "strongman" Fulgencio Batista.  He, of course, was the non-communist dictator who was deposed by Fidel Castro's communist revolution in 1958.  He's one of those dictators who is caricatured by the likes of the History Channel and Biography Channel for the sin of either deposing socialist leaders (like Augusto Pinochet did in Chile) or opposing the rise of socialist/communist leaders (like Batista in Cuba).  I'll never forget watching back-to-back History International Channel documentaries on Joseph Stalin and Augusto Pinochet one evening a few years ago.  The Stalin piece portrayed him as a ruler with a mixed legacy.  (Stalin ordered or caused the death of approximately 50 million of his own citizens.)  The Pinochet piece began with words like "One of the most evil men of the 20th century..."  Pinochet's coup is estimated to have caused the deaths of about 3 thousand Chileans.  50 million vs. 3 thousand. 
 
Once Fidel Castro proved to be not only a blood-stained communist tyrant but also an economic illiterate, it became vital to portray pre-Castro Cuba as no better than Fidel's insane policies had made it.  This is false.  Humberto Fontova (who writes on this fine website) knows it, and can prove it.  You'll find some of the evidence in this column.  When you've finished the article, I suggest that you click on the columnist's archive link, and spend some time reading his other columns.  There's a great education on reality in Cuba therein.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ABC Radio Propaganda and Blood Transfusions

In a world where so many fixtures of life can come crashing down, it's nice that we can count on ABC Radio "News" to feed us Democratic talking points.  I was listening to my local talk show station when I heard a spokesman for the (surprise!) left-wing Council on Foreign Relations detailing ways to deal with the skyrocketing gas prices.  Shockingly, none of them have anything to do with tapping our own abundant but so far unaccessed supplies.  This man said we should push for the "next generation of energy sources" (presumably more money down the wind/solar/gerbils-on-exercise-wheels rathole), "incentives" for the purchase of more efficient vehicles (more money down another rat-hole -- think Chevy Volt), and even higher CAFE standards (cars made of aluminum which will turn backing into the mailbox into a life-threatening experience).  No voice from the use-our-own-resources camp, of course, was allowed onto the broadcast.
 
Coincidently, I thought of why BO is considering tapping our strategic oil reserves instead of allowing oil companies to develop our own resources.  Doing the latter, of course, would make the country stronger, more independent, and wealthier.  Tapping the reserve without making other changes is, conversely, like pump blood transfusions into a bleeding person without stopping the bleeding.  You're left with the same problem, without the resources to cope with it that you had before.  You're left weaker, more dependent, and poorer.  Just what BO and the interdependence choir want.
 
This gang is easy to predict once you realize what they really have in mind for America.  And it's not pretty.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Non-Barking Baptist Dogs and the Westboro BS Church

I'm a weary crab tonight, but I must point out something that's bothering me.  Has anyone seen a parade of leading American Baptists denouncing and renouncing the traveling freak show that calls itself the Westboro Baptist Church?  I haven't either. 

Has anyone asked why not?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pound the Westboro Mob!

Okay, we tried.  We took the Westboro BS Church, or at least peace-loving Americans who think that funerals should be dignified and respected ceremonies of mourning and healing did.  All the way to the Supreme Court they went, only to have eight -- EIGHT -- Supreme Court Justices stick their heads firmly up their posteriors and rule that the First Amendment Freedom of Speech protects the right to raise a ruckus at an event having nothing to do with anything they're raising a ruckus about.  BY the justices' reasoning, if they were to invade a kindergarten class and yell obscenities and wave revolting placards, that would be protected speech, too.  This decision is fantastically stupid, and should go far toward destroying whatever reputation for intelligence the current members of the Court (except for Associate Justice Samuel Alito, who got it right) have left.

The old question arises again -- how do you protect your rights when the powers that be (stupid) will not?  Well, desperate situation, desperate remedy.  I suggest that the next time that rabble shows up anywhere, two things may be considered:

Burn down their church while they're gone.

Beat the ____ out of them. 

I would be willing to contribute to the legal defense of anyone who did either of these things, although it would have to be a reaction to one of their disgusting actions.  I'm willing to bet a lot of people would be willing to support them, as well.

By the way, what happened to the sacred "right of privacy"?  The pro-aborts claim that it applies in the case of abortion.  Why, pray tell, shouldn't that right apply to funerals?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Accumulated Notes

Since I'm still honored as Featured Blog on Townhall.com, I thought I should write a little something other than tributes to my father, who died 17 days ago. 
 
 
Hydrofracking is one method by which fields of natural gas deep underground can be accessed  for use to heat homes, etc.  It consists of pumping high-pressure water to fracture (thus the name) rock that is blocking access to the economically-vital gas.  The usual Luddite and "Watermelon" (Green on the outside, red on the inside) enviros are suing to block all attempts to use this advanced technology, despite (or perhaps because of) the fact that accessing this source of fuel would lessen our dependence on foreign energy sources.  They claim that the materials pumped into the fracture to maintain its width would cause environmental damage.  It is of no use to point out to them that most of what's pumped into the earth by hydrofracking is water (thus the first part of the term), that materials such as sand and ceramics have not hitherto been considered pollutants, and that all of this is to be pumped deep under the surface of the earth anyway.  After all, these are the same scienticific ignoramuses who are trying to tell us that carbon dioxide is a pollutant.
 
I vote we tell the H-F opponents to go frack themselves.
 
 
 
I can't help but chuckle at the hysterical critics of the GOP's redoubtable Sarah Palin, and when I read yet another absurd attack on her I remember what a supporter of Grover Cleveland said about him at (I believe) a New York State Democratic Convention in the late 19th century -- "We love him also for the enemies he has made." 
 
You see, back then "honest Democrat" hadn't yet become an oxymoron.
 
 
 
In an otherwise excellent article by Dorothy Rabinowitz about the lethal political correctness that allowed jihad gunman Major Nidal Hasan to stay in the Army and gain promotion after promotion despite showing even more signs of mental instability that Maxine Waters does until he eventually killed 13 and wounded 32 at Fort Hood Army Base, a salient fact is omitted.  Part of the PCBS that made this incident more costly was that Major Hasan was the only person at the scene originally who was armed.  Due to an anti-gun pandering law put in place by President Billy Jeff Clinton, the troops ON an Army base were NOT ALLOWED TO CARRY GUNS ON THE BASE!  Thus, Major Hasan (who's first name is also the last name of famous 1980s terrorist Abu Nidal, which makes me wonder about his parents) was unopposed in firepower until the police arrived.  Only in Liberal LaLaLand does it make sense for the police to have to be called to an Army base to stop a jihadi Army officer who's murdering his fellow soldiers.



I knew if I stayed a telephone operator long enough this would happen.  Today a woman yelled at and hung up on me because she heard me breathing.  "Well, excuse me for breathing!"



Rush Limbaugh refers to the most radical of abortion proponents as Feminazis.  If you think that Rush's term is too harsh, I suggest you read these quotes.



I read another comment from some slack-brained liberal who said that we must not profile or even look suspiciously at Muslims because if we do so we will forfeit the "moral high ground".  In the blood-stained history of humanity I've seen or read of people who held onto the moral high ground and wound up buried on it.  No, thanks.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Since I'm in Mourning...

... I beg your indulgence and include the poem I wrote after my older brother John died in December of 1983.  Jonah Goldberg have something in common ... we're both short a father and a brother.  I didn't revere my brother the way I revered my father, but then John would have been disgusted with me if I had.  He had a keen appreciation of his own worth in comparison with Dad, and it was the same as my evaluation of my own self-worth against that same towering target.



For John

I have a photograph I carry
A picture of my brother
The brother who I loved
The brother whose opinion meant so much to me
The brother who died
Almost 16 years ago
It hardly seems possible
And I miss him more than words can say
And I miss him every single day
When I look around my crowded apartment
Crowded with reminders of him gone away
So very long ago
I see his desk, his dresser, his Army trunk
His catcher’s mask
And they remind me of him
But they’re not him
And when he died it ripped a hole
A hole in my soul that never heals
A knife in my heart that’s forever twisting
And the blood flows fresh over its jagged blade
And I’ll never look on his face again in this world
I pray we’ll meet in the next
If there is one

When we were young, it seems like yesterday
Or a hundred years ago
My mother shot pictures, shot roll after roll
Or so it seemed
And we laughed at her for taking so many
For taking too many
But we were wrong
So horribly wrong
I have a photograph I carry
Just one
Isn’t it strange
We all thought
We all knew
That Mom was taking too many photographs
We never dreamed she was taking too few
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

He Made Me the Crab I am Today

Dear Dad,
 
It's been two weeks since you shuffled off this mortal whatzit and left this world a dimmer place (in both senses).  The pain has mostly subsided to an ache, but I don't expect the ache to ever go away.  Today, with your permission, I am ending my official mourning period.
 
The unofficial period, of course, will last until I see you again (God willing).
 
I just re-read my previous letter to you, and I forgot to mention a few things I learned from you.  Some you chose to teach directly, and some I learned from watching you, but all of them were improvements to my character.  I wish to note a few of them here.
 
One of the greatest lessons I ever learned from you is that I must never "think with my heart".  It is a great mistake to be heartless, but all actions, even those motivated by the heart, must be thought through.  Great harm can be done by acting with good intentions and deficient forethought.  I should know -- I've done it more than once myself. 
 
You taught me to always apologize whenever I may have been or done wrong, even if my guilt is not incontrovertibly established.  You lived, according to my observations (and I had 51 years to observe you), by the maxim "I've never gotten into trouble by apologizing too often."  Actually, you taught me never to apologize for being right, but always apologize for being wrong.  I'm getting better at that, but I can't claim perfection yet.
 
You taught me that we must always be learning.  One of the reasons that, for all of your modesty and self-deprecation, you stayed so sharp all of the way to the earthly end was that you were always gaining knowledge.  Whether it was reading the newspaper, reading books, watching Fox News, discussing past or current events, or traveling to historic places, your knowledge-gaining mechanism was welded in the "On" position.
 
You taught me not only to trust my own judgment, but also how to hone my judgment to a sharpness that would justify my trust.  You taught me to examine people and events myself, and to never discard my own opinion just because someone else has a reputation as an expert.  When  Friedrich von Hayek wrote that it would be difficult to imagine a more dreary world than one in which all of the supposed experts had the authority to run all matters in their fields, he wasn't telling me anything that I hadn't already learned from my wise father.
 
You taught me to beware of iconoclasts.  The world will always have imbeciles who claim that Abraham Lincoln was a racist despot who cared nothing about slavery, or that the Holocaust never happened, or that George W. Bush and Richard Cheney were war criminals.  The freedom that God gave to every human being to have their own opinions does not entitle idiots to have their opinions respected.  Berke Breathed (the creator of the Bloom County comic strip) wrote that if 50 million people do a stupid thing, it is still a stupid thing.  I knew this already -- thanks to you.
 
You taught me that racism isn't just disgusting -- it's also intellectual laziness.  Thomas Sowell (I believe) wrote that there is no such thing as a "typical" white person, or black person, or Korean or any other sub-grouping.  there are on this planet some 7 billion plus individuals, and only a mental dullard believes otherwise.
 
There does seem to be a lot of them about, Dad.  Thanks for making sure I didn't become one of them.
 
You taught me that it is important to be polite, but even more important to be honest, and that's why PC is BS.   
 
You taught me to "play by the rules", and that's a key reason why illegal immigration is not to be tolerated or "winked at".  When the law is not unjust, there is no excuse for breaking it.  That's why the Underground Railroad was just, and modern illegal immigration is not.
 
You taught me that abortion is a legal absurdity and a moral atrocity.  You taught me that Roe v Wade was to life what Dred Scott v Sandford was to civil rights.
 
In one of the wisest observations I've ever encountered anywhere, you told me that the one fact of human nature that has made every tyrrany of history possible is that every population contains 5% who will betray the freedom of the other 95% for power and/or money.
 
You taught me that honor is more important than gain, and people are more important than things.
 
You didn't actually teach me that you were the greatest father I ever could have wished for, though.  I learned that one on my own!
 
Your loving, grateful, grieving son,
 
David
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Military Channel and the Lost Cause

The Robert E. Lee cult is making a comeback.  While not nearly as repulsive as neo-Confederates, the Lee lovers have a tendency to heavily edit history to make their actually-admirable-in-many-ways hero perfect, which he was not.  When documentaries attempting this appear on reputable television channels like the Military Channel, many of us are tempted to protest.  I entered a short-form protest re the program listed in the MC's schedule as "Gettysburg:  Battle".  They have a limit on how much commenting you can do, though, so I couldn't fit all of what I wanted to say.  The projected full version appears below:



The program listed as Gettysburg:  Battle was dreadful and inaccurate.  The script repeatedly called Robert E. Lee "undefeated".  Even if you ignore the early West Virginia campaign, Mechanicsville and Malvern Hill were indisputably defeats.  In fact, the Confederate disaster at Malvern Hill foreshadowed Lee's bloody blunder known to history as Pickett's Charge.  

General Meade was at the time of his promotion relatively unknown to the public, but he was not "undistinguished".  He was, in fact, rated highly by his brother officers.  His performance at Gettysburg seldom gets the recognition it deserves.  

The casting of General Richard Ewell was absurd.  The very hairy actor (or re-enactor) in the role bore no resemblance to "Old Bald Head".

Culp's Hill was hardly undefended at the end of the first day of battle.  There was a full division of Union troops on the way to the hill, dispatched by temporary Union commander Winfield Scott Hancock when he spotted the potential threat to the North end of the line.  Many Lee idolaters like to blame Dick Ewell for the failure to take the not-exactly-undefended height, saying that the late "Stonewall" Jackson would have read Lee's order as a positive order to attack.  Two points:

When Ewell stated that his men had been fighting all day and were exhausted, he was telling the truth.

It is the commander's responsibility to know his subordinates' personalities.  If Ewell required a positive order to attack Culp's Hill, then Lee should have known this and given him one.  A discretionary order is just that -- discretionary.  Ewell was within his rights to decline to attack on those circumstances, just as McPherson was within his rights not to attack in the absence of positive orders from Sherman at Resaca, at the begin of the Atlanta campaign.

A Confederate victory at Gettysburg would not have necessarily have won the war for the South as claimed.  Vicksburg still would have surrendered to Grant’s army on the 4th of July.  The blockade would have remained in place.  President Lincoln would not have given up, and was not up for re-election for over a year.  The war would have taken a different course, but since the Emancipation Proclamation had made the American war a war that Europe couldn’t safely touch, the end very likely would have been the same.  

This whole production reeks of “Lost Cause” romanticism, with Lee as the perfect military leader foiled by fate and by a subordinate’s blunder.  In fact, Gettysburg was a well-earned victory for the Union Army.  It pains the Lee cult to admit that for those three days in July of 1863, General George G. Meade was a better general than Robert E. Lee, but it’s true, and Pickett’s Charge proves it.  

I was pleasantly surprised at one fact the documentary got right, though.  Yes, the Southerners were fighting to preserve slavery, whether they owned slaves or not.  At least the producers settled for a “Lost Cause” production, instead of the full neo-Confederate production.  So that’s some consolation.

Sincerely,

The Hermit Crab

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

'Til Death Did They Part

At a glance, they seemed an unlikely prospect for romance.  They met in Heidelberg, Germany, at the end of the Second World War.  She was a small, beautiful Polish DP (Displaced Person) working in a coffee-and-doughnut cafe catering to GIs.  He was even younger, not so good-looking, smallish US soldier stationed in Heidelberg in the aftermath of the most destructive war in human history.  He fell in love when he first saw her, but to her he was nothing but another hard-drinking occupation soldier far from home and far from impressive.  He told his soldier buddies that he would marry her someday, but they had no reason to believe it.  He was lucky if they didn't laugh. 

Actually, he was lucky, period.  Make that exclamation point.

The beautiful DP had a problem.  She couldn't go home.  The communists had taken over in Poland once the Nazis had been driven out, so Poland was still not really free.  Her father advised her not to come home.  So what could she do for a future?

The young GI had it better.  The GIs in the American zone had it nice, since Germany was largely on a "candy bars and chocolate" economy, and the soldiers were the only people in town who had plenty of both.  What he didn't have was the girl of his dreams, although he could see her every time she worked.  What he did have was a sense of humor and a never-say-die determination.  He had told his friends that he would marry that beautiful woman, and he had every intention of doing just that. 

He asked her out -- again and again.  She turned him down every time for many weeks, but then she softened.  She claimed that she said "yes" so that her friends could be amused when he fell over in shock, but I'm not sure I believe that.  Whatever the reason, she said yes.  They went out. 

And the romance began.

They climbed mountains and went hiking together.  They saw Martha Raye together, and laughed together.  They fell in love together.  They married.

The bookish young soldier and the beautiful young bride journeyed back to America to meet his family, having to endure a fierce English Channel storm on the way.  It's debatable which prospect frightened her more.  She considered getting back on the bus when it let them off, and the young soldier's family rushed forward to greet him, but not her at that moment.  She saw the 10 year old boy Richard beaming at her, though, so she decided to give it a chance. 

Eventually his family decided that they loved her, too.  Some hardscrabble times followed.  The post World War Two upstate New York economy was hardly booming, and for a time they had to rely on the kindness of family and friends to help them get established.  Eventually they managed to get their own apartment, and later they would relocate twice more.  He held several different jobs (sometimes more than one at a time), and she would work for 17 years as a waitress.  A fine waitress.  He would eventually become a sheet-metal worker, one of the best in the whole state.
 
They finally found themselves with their own version of the American Dream -- five children and a mortgage.
 
They raised their children to be independent thinkers, and must have more than once regretted that decision, at least temporarily.  They had victories and defeats, like any other people.  They lost one son tragically young, and had to cope with the loss together.  Among all of the changing circumstances of their lives, the one thing they had always was their love, which grew stronger and stronger as the years passed.  That love was ever present and nearly always visible to those around them.  It was a joy to their family, and an ever-present example to their children.  Their niece Florence said that the first thing she thought of whenever she thought of Uncle David and Aunt Marie was the way their eyes shone every time they looked at each other.  Their daughter-in-law Carol saw the same thing, and was moved as well.
 
Over the years, the children had children, and them some of those children had children, and so they found they were heading a four-generation family.  The grand-children soon learned what a gift it was to have grandparents who were so perfect together.  Grandma and Grampa's house became a haven of comfort and affection.  They had reached a depth of love that few people will ever know in their lives.  They had made themselves into a perfect couple.
 
They fulfilled their marriage vows beautifully, having supported each other in poverty and in (relative) plenty, and in sickness and in health, forsaking all others, but then the end of the oath got them.
 
David got ill, and this time he did not recover.  He sickened, and all too soon he went home to die.  He refused to go to a hospice house, for his determination was to spend every minute he could near his beloved Maria.  The whole family flocked to his bedside, and he was glad to see them all, but they all ranked behind Mom/Grandma, and all knew and understood.  Carol remarked that even at the end, his seemingly lifeless eyes would pick up life and love when his beloved Maria approached him.  To the end, they were the two in love of whom their grand-daughter Michelle said "I've never seen anyone like them.  They're like a great love story.  Somebody should make a movie about them!"
 
Sadly, death did part them last Thursday (February 10th, a date that will live in family infamy) after almost 64 years -- but only for the moment, for evidence of their special love endures.  David will have no funeral now.  His remains will be cremated, and the urn will be given to Maria for safekeeping until her time comes.  Then they shall have a double funeral, no doubt accompanied by enough tears to float a kayak, if not a yacht.  Even the trappings of death cannot separate them, for they are one of the great unknown love stories of history.  They shall, until their very last earthly moment, be the ideal two in love for all of us who had the privilege to know them and to see what love can be.
 
Typing the last few paragraphs was a little uncomfortable for me.  I'm not used to referring to these wonderful people as David and Maria.  I'm much more accustomed to calling them Dad and Mom.  On this sad St. Valentine's Day, I shall reflect on the greatest romance I have ever had the fortune to see, that of my own parents, the two most wonderful people I shall ever know.
 
Happy St. Valentine's Day.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Lessons My Father Taught Me

Dear Dad,
 
It's been three painful days since you left this world for the next one, and left dozens of family and friend to mourn for you.  I went to church today, but could not sing as I usually do, for fear that my throat would tighten up, as it does when I remember that I will never see you or speak to you again unless and until I make the cut to go to Heaven.  (You, of course, made the cut easily.)  I am left here to reflect on all of the lessons you taught me, some of which I have not, to my embarrassment, learned very well.
 
You taught me that a man can be great without any of the trappings of greatness as the world defines the word.  He can be a great man, if fact, while living in near-total anonymity, simply by doing all of the ordinary tasks of life with integrity and sincerity.  This you did throughout your 83 years, leaving to those who knew you an example that we can look to the rest of our lives.
 
You taught me that a man must seek his God and the truth the entirety of his life.  I will always be grateful for the thirst for truth that you planted in me when I was still a young boy, first learning that this life can be difficult, brutal, and downright unfair.  You taught me to learn about all facets of history, the savage as well as the peaceful; the ugly as well as the beautiful.  In order to promote and protect the best in life, man must understand always how the vicious and tyrannical can flourish in the absence of the effort of the good to defeat them.  Some think my relentless focus on the seamy side of human existence is bizarre or incomprehensible, but to them I tell them with pride that I am my father's son.
 
You taught me to trust in God absolutely, but to trust all else according to their merits.  You taught me to be unsparing in my evaluation of the trustworthiness of others, no matter who they are or how trustworthy I wish to believe them to be.  You even told me that you would lie to me yourself -- if the truth would cause more damage than the lie.  That was, I think, one of the most honest things anyone has ever said to me.
 
You taught me not to be overawed by anyone's academic credentials, no matter how seemingly impressive.  You taught me that the "intellectuals" were no better than Orwell described them in his famous statement "There are some ideas so transparently ridiculous that it takes an intellectual to believe them."
 
You taught me to give my word cautiously and sparingly, and to keep my word always.
 
You taught me to always  consider the possibility that I may be wrong, not because I am stupid (although it often seems that I am), but because I am human.  You allowed me to challenge your knowledge and beliefs, and even to persuade you a few times.  I may have even grown up to match you in intelligence.  In wisdom, of course, you beat me out of the field.  I'm not even close.
 
You taught me that a man loves his family.  Not just when they deserve it, but always.  Sometimes that unconditional love was all that stood between one or another of your children and catastrophe.  Sometimes that child was me.
 
You taught me that humor is as necessary to life as air.  There is so much pain and loss in this life that it cannot be survived without the ability to laugh.  There was never a better companion in life's journey than you, Dad.  Thanks for sharing that with me.
 
You showed me how to forgive, and not just me.  Your brother (and my uncle) Roy told me that you forgave your stepfather for the brutal way he treated you when you were growing up.  He said that you had forgiven so completely that when Grandpa asked your forgiveness, you replied "For what?"  You had erased all of that ill treatment from your ledger.  Uncle Roy said that it was the greatest example of Christian forgiveness  he had ever seen.  I hope to someday come near your mark in this, and in every other thing that makes a man a true Christian.  I have a lot of work to do.
 
You taught me not to take myself too seriously (or you tried to, anyway).  Your patience with young children is legendary.  You let them call you things like PaPa Poosie and Grandpa DooDoo, realizing the fact that it amused them, and you as well, without diminishing their respect and love for you.  Rather, it increased both.
 
You tried to teach me how a man chooses his battles.  You could be granite-hard when you had to be, but you chose your moments far better than I ever have.  I do not remember a single time when I saw you get angry or confrontational without just cause. 
 
You taught us throughout your life how a Christian man should love his wife, with unstinting devotion and absolute fidelity.  (Of course, it helped that Mom is so completely lovable.)   The love in your eyes when you looked at Mom never dimmed throughout 63 3/4 years of marriage.  Cousin Florence told me that that was the first thing she thought of whenever she thought of Uncle David and Aunt Marie.  She wasn't the only one.
 
Lastly, you taught us how a Christian dies -- with dignity, with love for his family, and without complaint.  Many of us thought (and think still)  that it is an injustice howling to the skies that you were taken down by a fourth cancer after you had already beaten three others, but you never uttered a word of complaint.  Even to your last day of this life, you were still leading by example.  By a towering act of will, you didn't let on how much you were suffering, choosing the stoicism of suffering in silence.  When my day comes, as it will, I hope I can face my fate with the courage and faith which you showed us.  I am not very confident that I can.
 
You were a better man than I have ever known.  You were better than I think I can ever be.  Your memory will be both a reproach and an inspiration to me as I struggle to fill any of the roles you filled so wonderfully throughout your 83 years.
 
If I could have given up the rest of my life to extend yours (in good health), I'd have done it in an instant.  The world would have gained in the exchange.
 
Your loving, proud, and grieving son,
 
David
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive