About Me

Name: The Hermit Crab
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Blog Roll

 

The Crab Cancels His Trip to Nevada

I guess I'm not going to Nevada after all.  I had planned to attend the ceremony in which Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would be re-placed in his coffin and would have a stake driven through his heart.  This would have followed his defeat by Sharron Angle, but sadly, this did not happen, so Count Harry remains, undead among the living, to plague us.  Oh, well...
 
(To any liberals who wandered here by mistake, the above is a joke.  Certainly funnier than anything you said about Bush and Cheney for 8 years.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Political Science 101

When I was growing up, I remember learning about Sickle Cell Anemia, a truly dreadful disease that afflicts mainly (or exclusively, I've forgotten which) black people.  It was for awhile perhaps the most publicized disease in America for years, until it was supplanted by AIDS. When AIDS appeared, the ADD media forgot about SCA.  This could not have been good for research funding.
 
While reading a pro-life publication this past weekend, I was startled to find that promising results are being achieved in the treatment of SCA.  I'll bet you hadn't heard about it either.  Right now you're yelling "What are they doing, Hermit Crab, and why don't I know about it??"
 
Here we run into a nasty collision of science and politics.
 
The reason you haven't heard about it is because the results are being obtained through the use of adult stem cells.  The media is not interested in promoting adult stem cell research (which shows great promise); they are interested in promoting embryonic stem cell research (which so far has produced nothing but tumors).  You see, if they promote embryo-destroying stem cell research, they believe they can further dehumanize the unique human life that the embryo is the first stage of, so that the abomination of abortion can be promoted.  So, even though the scientific news that adult stem cells are being used to treat a deadly (and formerly politically "popular" disease) is important and wonderful, they would rather not let you know about it, for fear that you will demand that government and private research change focus toward the more promising adult stem cell research. 
 
The media have made their choice, it seems.  Sorry, mostly-black sufferers of Sickle Cell Anemia.  It's more important to promote embryonic stem cell research and abortion than it is to promote research and treatment that may save your life.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Election Eve Must-Read!

I'll make this quick, since I want you to read the linked article immediately.  If you think ANYTHING is more important than voting this election, read this column by National Review's Victor Davis Hanson.  Sometimes it's galvanizing to see just what insane policies will be continued if we the people don't turn out in force to stop them.  Read the column, and then pass it around!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

No Nobel!

Crab friend Tony the Libertarian sent me a link to another psychotic Paul Krugman column, which led me again to ruminate on how the once-respected Nobel Prize(s) has (have) slipped in public esteem.  I trace the beginning of the slide to the awarding of the prize to terrorist Yasir Arafat in 1994.  (It may go back further, but that was the first outrageous awarding of the prize in my memory.  Actually, Rigoberta Menchu was awarded the prize in 1992, but she just turned out to be a fraud.)  For some years, only the Peace Prize seemed to be tainted, if "tainted" is a strong enough word for an award given to the UN, Kofi Annan, the International Atomic Energy Agency (do I hear Three Blind Mice playing somewhere?), global warming conners the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Albert Arnold (AlGore) Gore Jr., and the notoriously anti-Semitic international meddler Jimmy Carter.  A sort of peak was reached when the prize was first offered as a bribe, which is the only way to explain the 2009 awarding of the prize to Barack Obama.
 
Then the contagion spread.  In 2008 the Nobel Prize for Economics was awarded to loony economist Paul Krugman, who occasionally scribbles hysterical and error-ridden screeds for the New York Times.  His columns are so factually challenged that National Review Online used to carry a regular feature called the Krugman Truth Squad, dedicated to correcting all of the false assertions and deranged theorizing of the now-Nobel Laureate.  I miss the old feature, but Donald Luskin, Chief Investment Officer for Trend Macrolytics and unofficial chairman of the Truth Squad, has more important business to attend to than constantly correcting the honesty-allergic JK Galbreath-without-the-charm Krugman.  When the committeee gave away the prize to a loon, they also gave away what remained of their credibility.  To win the award in economics, it is now clear, you don't even have to ever be right, as long as you're Left.
 
If the (audibly oxymoronic) Nobel Committee ever tries to give me the prize, I intend to sue for slander.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rochester NY Mayor Bob Duffy Finally Achieves Distinction!

Rochester NY's appalling mayor, Bob Duffy (the genius who believed that the way to attract businesses to downtown Rochester was to raise the parking fees) has been making political adverts for his fellow upstate NY Democrats.  A particular jaw-dropper was his spot for carpetbagger Dan Maffei, a typical Democrat hack who purportedly represents the area around Syracuse, but who actually lives in Washington, DC (Den of Corruption).  Maffei votes with House Speaker Nazi Pelosi 96% of the time, but Duffy declares that Maffei is "the most independent" representative he knows of.  In a campaign full of Democratic lies, this may be the biggest whopper told during this year's campaign.  It's hard to beat 96%.
 
Dufus, er, I mean Duffy is running for Lieutenant Governor with political Mafioso Andrew Cuomo.  As far as many of us are concerned, it will be some comfort to remember that if Prince Andrew Capone is elected Governor, at least it will get this perjurious chipmunk out of our county seat.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Hermit Crab's Cheap, Bigoted Jibe at Nihad Awad

Since Nihad Awad of CAIR (Council on American-Islamic Relations) always seems to have his knickers in a twist whenever anyone so much as cocks a skeptical eyebrow at the "Religion of Peace" and its excitable adherents, I, the Hermit Crab, pledge to forever after this hour refer to him (when I take notice of him at all) as Nihad A**wad.
 
It shouldn't take too much imagination to guess what I mean.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Just a Quick Question re Juan Williams

Where are the protests of the NAACP and the ACLU against the firing of Juan Williams, black American news analyst fired by NPR (aka Welfare Radio) for exercising his First Amendment right of free speech?  Maybe we have a hint now on who NAACP President (or Chairman, or whatever his title is) Ben Jealous is jealous of?

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Letter to Carl Paladino, Republican Nominee for Governor of New York

Below I reprint the letter I sent to the embattled Republican nominee for Governor of New York, Carl Paladino.  He is opposed by classic Democrat corruptocrat Andrew Cuomo, trying to get elected to the job from which his father, the reptilian Mario Cuomo, was fired by voters 16 years ago.  It drives me crazy when I see obvious errors and omissions by the people running Republican election campaigns.  Didn't Lee Atwater have any proteges?



Dear Mr. Paladino,
 
I am getting frustrated with your campaign.  Your people are letting the Prince Andrew campaign get away with calling you an Albany insider, even though I've read that Lil' Andy went straight from law school into the NY administration of his father, the man whose tax-and-spend policies essentially tore up our state's ticket on the Reagan Rocket Ride of the 1980s, and whom we fired in (I believe) 1994. 
 
The corruption charges in Cuomo's ads must be answered.  If they are false (as I suspect), the voters need to get the truth from you (sourced whenever possible).  On the other hand, Andy was a corrupt Secretary of HUD, and was (and is!) a power-abusing Attorney General.  He wanted to be Governor, so he used his power to investigate then-governor Eliot Spitzer, and then bullied David Paterson out of running for his own term in office. 
 
Now, and most outrageously, Andy obtained a waiver from the Obama/Holder Justice Department, so that his office will not have to insure compliance with the Military and Overseas Voter Empowerment Act (MOVE Act), the act that was passed to insure that our military men and women, who ought to have their votes counted first (for no-one deserves them more), have their right to vote protected.  With the waiver, New York officials (Democrats) are under no obligation to insure that the military (largely Republican voting) gets their ballots in time to beat the deadline for casting them and sending them in.  This is an outrage!
 
It is also an outrage that your campaign has not shouted from the rooftops that dirty-fighting Democrats are again attempting to disenfranchise our heroic military personnel.
 
Time is getting short.  I am a poor man, but I'd be willing to give to your campaign (again) if I could count on my few dollars being used wisely.
 
By the way, do not take back one word of what you said about homosexuals and homosexual marriage.  What you said was exactly right, and I suspect that more people agree with you than the media and the other leftists would ever admit.  Every ballot measure in every state that would have established homosexual marriage by popular vote has been defeated.  You occupy the moral high ground here.  Don't retreat from it.
 
Sincerely,

The Hermit Crab
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Crab Letters -- Advice to a Republican Senatorial Candidate

Here is my letter to a candidate for the Senate in New York State, running against New York's favorite dumb blonde, Kirsten Gillibrand.  Cute little Kirsten posed as a moderate Democrat when she was running for the House seat representing a conservative (for NY)  district, but who dropped the mask when she was appointed to the Senate seat vacated by Carpetbagger Clinton, now embarrassing our country as Secretary of State.



Dear Mr. Dioguardi,

What are you waiting for?  Kirsten Gillibrand (the appointed Senator chosen by an accidental governor) has voted against the will and interests of the people of New York time and time again.  Why haven't I seen any ads reminding voters of these betrayals?  She's supposed to be representing the people of our state, not BO and Dead Man Walking Harry Reid.  She's trying to soft-focus herself to victory in November, and time is getting short.  All you need to do is remind people of the issues (Health Care Hostile Takeover, Porculus, Cap-and-Trade, etc.), and that Gillibrand voted against the wishes of the people of New York.
 
This is a fight.  Nay, this is a war!  Go for the win!  We need you in Albany!!
 
The Hermit Crab
Hilton, NY
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Dim Jim Carter Hospitalized!

I saw an item on TownHall.com on the right side of the page I was reading, announcing that ex-President and on-running disaster Dim Jim Carter, notorious anti-Semite and chronic meddler in world affairs, had been rushed to a hospital.  My first thought was that the Truth, having grown impatient after forty years of waiting to be recognized, had finally bitten Jimmy on the *ss.
 
Carter was unable to identify his assailant.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Notes Scribbled in Haste

Reading the vaporings of the unstable of editorial writers at the New York Times, one can well believe that the editorial board believes that the New Deal saved America in the 1930s.  Their editorial page is a WPA-like project, providing work for the otherwise unemployable.
 
 
 
Every school year we get to read about American schools which are exposing our young people to Islamic indoctrination under the guise of "multi-culturalism".  I'm glad these dhimwits weren't running the schools during World War II.  They would have had their pupils goose-stepping through the halls and at gym class.
 
 
When Rand Paul was campaigning for the Republican senatorial nomination in Kentucky, I predicted that he would lose if nominated.  He has since not only been nominated, but has opened up a considerable lead in the polls against his Democratic opponent.  I would like to say here that if I am proved wrong on this one, I will accept my embarrassment with a big smile on my face.  Go, Rand!
 
 
Is anyone else as tired as I am of Michelle "Boo-Hoo" Obama complaining about her sheltered, priviledged life?  The woman was raised in a comfortable style that fewer than half of Americans can match, she sails through an Ivy League college without attaining any intellectual distinction (the one thesis she wrote that leaked out was a self-pitying embarrassment), she gets a job at a hospital which pays six figures because she's the daughter of a prominent political family, she gets a position created for her at that hospital (with a $200,000 raise) the same day that her husband becomes a United States Senator (the job was eliminated when she left the hospital -- can you say "bribe"?), she wastes millions of taxpayer dollars on her entertainment and vacations while First "Lady", she's narcissistic enough to think that being FL gives her the right to tell us what food we should eat, and now she says that being FL is "hell"?  Poor little rich girl!
 
If you hate the life so much, Michelle, just give it up -- and go away!
 
 
 
The Crab notes with disgust that the teacher's union machine in Washington DC (Den of Corruption) has defeated reform-minded Mayor Adrian Fenty's bid for re-election by beating him with a typical Democratic hack in the Democratic primary.  If the Republicans had any sense, they would select Fenty as their nominee for the usually-unattainable office.  It would be fun watching the septic stream media trying to cover that race.
 
 
 
Did anyone else notice how abruptly the WikiLeaks scandal vanished from the headlines when it was discovered that the leaking soldier, PFC Bradley Manning, is a militant (pun intended) homosexual?  They don't want a debate on this matter, or else some unkind souls and rigorous thinkers might decide that having homosexuals in the military might be a bad idea.  Number me among them.
 
 
 
Given the weekly revelations about terrible ideas in the so-called health care reform bill (I contend that "deform" would be more accurate), maybe the bill should be referred to as the Patient Protection from Affordable Health Care Act.
 
 
 
Funny, isn't it, how we are supposed to hold the youthful dabblings of Republican Senate candidate Christine O'Donnell with witchcraft against her, but we are never to mention the Muslim schools that BO attended, or the sincerity of his conversion to Christianity?  Actually, as an old-fashioned Catholic Christian, I contend that their were no NO Christians in Jeremiah Wright's indoor circus.  To call that Christianity is to rob the word of its meaning.  Wright was (and is) working for the other side.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Another NRA Exec Insults Dissenting Members

Before this year, I was a many-year, very satisfied member of the NRA.  However, events this year have shaken my faith in the organization's leadership.  Many of us were shocked when it surfaced that the NRA's Political Victory Fund was considering endorsing Harry Reid (D-NV), the current Senate Majority Leader, who has an awful record when it comes to gun rights (and most other Constitutional rights, as well), against pro-gun stalwart Sharron Angle.  When we wrote to object to this idea, we received an insulting form reply. 
 
Arguably worse has been the NRA's shameless sleazy dealing with the would-be restrictors of free speech.  Instead of taking an uncomplicated, principled stand against the DISCLOSE Act sponsored by the twin sleazoids Charles Schumer (D-espotic) and
Chris Van Hollen (D-isgusting), the NRA sought and received a "carve-out" that would preserve their freedom of speech, while allowing the rights of smaller groups (some allies of the NRA) to be smothered.  Unsurprisingly, this brought the organization a good deal of criticism.  Also unsurprisingly, NRA-ILA Executive Director Chris Cox defended the NRA against the criticism in his NRA HQ Bulletin in the September issue of their America's First Freedom magazine.
 
Surprisingly, Cox's peevish, hypocritical, and offensive reply actually makes matters worse.
 
First, the substance:  Cox is naive to think that the "carve-out" would last long.  It would only last as long as it takes for a leftist pressure group, or even an anti-gun-rights group like the Violence Policy Center or the Brady Campaign to find an activist judge to rule that the special status is a violation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, and the NRA's priviledge would vanish.  Perhaps it would be a good thing if Cox learned all of the Constitution, and not just the first two amendments to it.
 
They also seem willing to protect themselves, and forfeit all of the advantages of having allies with similar goals.  It isn't just arrogant for the NRA to agree to a membership-minimum line for the carve-out that preserves their own free-speech rights, while leaving the rights of all other pro-2nd Amendment groups unprotected, it's foolish and short-sighted.  Short-sighted, because anyone who knows how our courts work these days knows that the special priviledge will last only as long as it takes for a federal judge to declare it unconstitutional as a violation of "equal protection under the law".  Instead of invalidating the whole law for the many, the judge will eliminate the priviledge for the few.  Foolish, because by negotiating a bar for the "carve-out" so high that the NRA qualifies, but no other 2nd Amendment group does, they make it too transparent that they are trying to convince the members of the other organizations that they must join the NRA in order to have their associational free speech rights respected.  They also guarantee that if they themselves come under focussed atttack, they will receive no support from the other gun groups, and in truth they will not deserve any.
 
Cox makes his bad case in a bad way -- with arrogance, petulance, and dishonesty.  He claims that the NRA holds the "ultimate responsibility for defense of the Second Amendment" in their hands.  While the NRA is the largest pro-gun group, they are about 4 million members in a country of over 300 million.  The American people as a whole are reponsible for protecting their rights.  No one organization is.
 
He justifies his failure to side with the Chamber of Commerce in protection of their mutual right to be heard by referring to the NRA's refusal to join the Chamber in backing illegal immigration amnesty, or when they supported Sonia Somediocre for the Supreme Court.  In other words, he reminds us of times when the NRA disagreed with the Chamber and refused to support them as justification for not supporting them on an issue upon which the two organizations agree.  Rationalization doesn't get more dishonest than that.
 
He also spends a paragraph whining about the people who have criticized the NRA on these issues, referring to the attacks as "rumor peddling and rock-throwing".  He refuses to admit that the critics include some long-time supporters and members of the NRA, who were sincerely distressed at the seemingly shady deal-making that was such an unwelcome contrast to the leadership's usual forthrightness.  He writes "Not one of these critics comes near the size,scope, and resources of your NRA".  Those measurements are not at issue.  The issues are judgment and integrity, and many of us were concerned that the NRA leadership have been falling short of those standards that we had come to expect.  We have the right to expect our leaders to be honest and principled -- not arrogant and conniving.
 
It's long been said that politicians and diapers need to be changed often -- and for much the same reason.  Maybe we should add NRA-ILA Executive Directors to that list.
Tags: Chris Cox   NRA  
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Welcome to Obamamerica!

I earn my living as a telephone operator, and I'm beginning to pick up disturbing signs that the national character is beginning to follow that of the President, much as President Billy Jeff Clinton affected opinions as what did and did not qualify as having sex (usually with someone, but the Joycelyne Elders-recommended type, too).  Specifically, I've noted three trends lately:
 
My callers are expending more and more words to get nowhere in particular, just like BO.
 
They are not listening to what I or other people say to them, just like BO.
 
They are willing to lie without hesitation or remorse, or even an awareness that their lies are completely implausable, just like BO.
 
God help us.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Primaries are Over. Patriots, Unite!

The Republicans Need to Show Some Class (on Both Sides)

The primaries are over, barring a recount or two. Opportunity beckons the Republicans, the conservatives, and patriotic, intelligent independents who want to save our country from becoming the Fragmented States of Obamamerica.

Will they blow it?

The signs so far are disquieting to someone like me, who started watching nation elections 42 years ago. We’re watching the sad spectacle of appointed-by-her-daddy Senator Lisa Murkowski trying to find someone, anyone to back her for re-election after she was defeated by Tea Party candidate Joe Miller. There has been more rancor in this Republican primary season than I have ever seen in a mid-term election before. The Democratic media is pitching in with their trouble-making, trying to foment the discord that may be the only chance the Democrats have to hold their power, or at least one house of Congress. Tea Party conservatives have crowed loudly over their victories, and spoke bitterly and resentfully about their defeats. Rush Limbaugh as I write this is engaged in a diatribe claiming that “establishment” Republicans don’t care about the country; they only care about power. Actually, his monologue at the bottom of the second hour today was perhaps the most disgraceful I’ve ever heard from him, and I’ve been listening for about 20 years.

I see two great obstacles in the path of national salvation via the defeat of Obamaism. One is that no-one on the right seems to remember what a political party is for, and the other is that too many on our side seem unable to distinguish the difference between a rival and an enemy.

To those who know history, the great worry is a repetition of 1912. Then, a bitter split between Republican incumbent President William Howard Taft and the man he succeeded, flamboyant and self-centered Progressive Republican Theodore Roosevelt enabled Democrat candidate Woodrow Wilson to sneak though to the Presidency, where he would do incalculable harm to the republic that both Republicans had wanted so badly to lead. Ever since that year, patriotic Republicans have feared another pestilential factional quarrel that would split the party faithful and cause them to lose vital elections that they could win. For the most part, they've avoided these disasters in the past, with the exceptions of 1964, 1992, ... and 2008.

In 2008, moderate Republican Senator John McCain took advantage of the failure of the conservative Republicans to unite on a candidate (combined with the winner-take-all nature of many state primaries) to win the Republican nomination for President. He won fairly, with no allegations of cheating like the ones surrounding the Democratic nominee, radical leftist Senator Barack Obama. He entered the race with a career American Conservative Union rating of 82%, and a 2008 rating of 63%. Obama's corresponding ACU ratings were 10% and 4%.

Horribly, all too many conservatives refused to support McCain, because he wasn't conservative enough for them. My friend Achilles was among them. I don't care how bumptious and irritating you think John McCain is, a 59 point spread is enough to overcome it -- as long as your goal is to benefit your country, and not just to "punish" Republicans somewhat to the left of you. Moral preening is seldom pretty and never appropriate, especially when the future of your country is at stake.

Having withheld their votes from McCain then, many conservatives are now demanding that the more moderate members of their party support the more conservative candidates that have been nominated in several states just two years later. To put it another way, having failed to behave as party members in 2008, they are demanding that their rivals behave as loyal party members this year. Speaking as both a life-long conservative and a Republican, those conservatives who refused to vote for McCain in 2008 have no right to expect the moderate Republicans to do this. They can and must ask for it, but they do not have the right to demand or expect it.

I'll come back to this subject soon, since otherwise this post may grow long and unruly as ivy in a Chicago ballpark. For now, may I just remind all that political parties exist to advance the similar interests of people who do not necessarily agree on all subjects, but who have essentially compatible agendas. One cannot establish too many "litmus tests", or you will render your party too small to accomplish anything. The greatest leaders in American history were great harmonizers and conciliators. It's often forgotten that the very first Republican President, Abraham Lincoln, was a brilliant politician, who managed to lead a party that was only 6 years old when he was elected in 1860. During the Civil War, there were times when the party nearly split into radical and conservative (by 1860s terms) wings. Lincoln handled these occasions with deft brilliance, and kept his party together under circumstances rarely equaled for complexity.

The moderate Republicans of today are the conservative Republicans of 1860. They are our rivals. The Obama/Pelosi/Reid Democrats are our enemies. We must defeat them, or our constitutional democratic republic may disappear forever.

Never forget that.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Primary Elections Over, Minefield Ahead -- New York State Edition

Primary Day is normally frustrating for a conservative Republican crab like me.  My New York State Republican Party has perhaps the most brain-dead leadership of any major state party.  My only hope is that enough New York Republicans wake up and wrest control from "the fools who bring disaster upon us."  We had one good sign last night, as insurgent Republican candidate Carl Paladino dumped the hopeless (but Republican leadership endorsed) Rick Lazio, who hasn't held office or even been visible since he managed to lose the 2000 Senate election to a corrupt, megalomaniac politician's wife, and a lecherous, impeached politician at that.  I've noticed that not even the Dem-media has been saying that Paladino's victory lessens the GOP's chances against Democratic nominee Prince Andrew Cuomo.
 
Other than that, the news wasn't much fun.  David Malpass lost the nomination to oppose New York's dumb blonde Senator Kirsten Gillibrand to a moderate Republican named Joe DioGuardi, and Gary Bernsten lost his race to oppose the appalling Senator Chuck Schumer to Jay Townsend
 
Am I disappointed?  Sure.
 
Will I vote for the nominees who defeated them in November?  Absolutely, and if you're a New Yorker, so should you.  Don't ever forget, if you're a patriot, elections are at bottom about doing what is best for your country.  They are not a chance for you to act out of self-interest or your personal pique. 
 
There is no issue - none - where Gillibrand and Schumer are better than DioGuardi and Townsend.  G and S are too dreadfully typical of Beltway Democratism today.  Economically illiterate, contemptuous of public opinion, environmentally both hysterical and dictatorial, unable to accept and learn from reality, including the reality of their own fallability, they are a cancer in the body of America.  They need to be cut out.  The choice is no longer between the good and the arguably better, it is between the good and the disastrous.
 
It really isn't that difficult a choice.
 
By the way, if you live in New York, the Bill Nojay Show is perhaps the best source of information I know of for New York news.  Podcasts and downloadable audio are available here, and live streaming 2-3:00 PM here.  (Click on the Listen Live icon at the upper right corner of the page.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive